Imprimatur
← The great ideas

Custom and Convention

Key terms
Nature and convention
Habit and conscience
Custom in society
Custom and thought

Nature and convention

Does a rule hold because it is part of how things are, or because people decided it? Nature is what holds without human choice, and convention is what holds because it is laid down. These readings ask which one lies behind our ideas of right and wrong.

4 readings

In Plato’s Gorgias, Callicles takes up the argument against Socrates and distinguishes what is just “by nature” from what is just by “convention”. His speech is the dialogue’s strongest statement of the claim of nature against law, and Socrates replies to it at length. It stands under this term for the opposition of “convention and nature” in the words of the dialogue.

In Book V of the Nicomachean Ethics, in the chapter on political justice, Aristotle distinguishes what is just “by nature” from what is “legal” or conventional, and considers the objection that the natural cannot change. The distinction was taken up by later writers on natural right and by the scholastics. It is placed here for his use of the pair “by nature” and “conventional”.

In Book II of On Christian Doctrine, Augustine, treating of signs, distinguishes the arrangements that are “devices of men” from those that are divinely instituted, and names dress, signs, weights, measures and coinage among the former. The work, begun about 396 and completed in 426, shaped Christian teaching on scripture and signs for centuries. It sits under nature and convention as his account of what is instituted by men.

In Act I, scene 2 of King Lear, the bastard Edmund speaks alone, invoking “Nature” as his goddess against the “plague of custom” that makes him illegitimate. Shakespeare gives the soliloquy to the play’s intriguer, and it opens the plot against his brother Edgar. It stands under nature and convention for the appeal to “Nature” and “law” against the “curiosity of nations”.