The Cratylus is Plato’s dialogue on the “correctness of names”, and in this opening exchange Hermogenes puts to Socrates the view that names rest on “convention and agreement”. The dialogue sets Hermogenes against Cratylus, who holds that names belong to things by nature. The passage sits under this term as the conventional side of that dispute.
Read in contextI have often talked over this matter, both with Cratylus and others, and cannot convince myself that there is any principle of correctness in names other than convention and agreement; any name which you give, in my opinion, is the right one, and if you change that and give another, the new name is as correct as the old—we frequently change the names of our slaves, and the newly-imposed name is as good as the old: for there is no name given to anything by nature; all is convention and habit of the users;—such is my view. But if I am mistaken I shall be happy to hear and learn of Cratylus, or of any one else.
SOCRATES. I dare say that you may be right, Hermogenes: let us see;—Your meaning is, that the name of each thing is only that which anybody agrees to call it?
HERMOGENES. That is my notion.
