Imprimatur
← The great ideas

Tyranny

Key terms
Its nature
Its sources
Its kin
Its course

Rule for the ruler’s good

What makes a ruler a tyrant? On the oldest answer, a tyrant is one who rules for his own good and not for the good of those he governs. These readings ask what separates a king from a tyrant, and where the line between lawful power and force is drawn.

5 readings

In chapter 8 of the First Book of Kings (the First Book of Samuel in the Hebrew numbering), in the Douay-Rheims text, the people ask Samuel for a king, and he is bidden to tell them “the right of the king that shall reign over you”. He lists what the king “will take” of sons, daughters, fields and flocks, and ends, “you shall be his servants”. The chapter is the Bible’s warning on the abuse of kingly power. It sits under “Rule for the ruler’s good” as that warning.

In Book III, chapter 7, of the Politics, Aristotle gives the right and the “corruptions” of the forms of government. He says “a tyranny is a monarchy where the good of one man only is the object of government”, and names the oligarchy and the democracy as the other deviations. The Politics is the principal ancient source for the classification. It sits under “Rule for the ruler’s good” as the definition.

In Book IV, chapter 4, of the City of God, Augustine asks “Justice being taken away, then, what are kingdoms but great robberies?” He tells the pirate’s answer to Alexander the Great. The passage is among the most cited in the tradition on the connection of rule and justice. It sits under “Rule for the ruler’s good” as that saying.

In Book I, chapter 1, of On Kingship (De regno), Aquinas, addressing the question of the best government, distinguishes the just forms from the unjust. He gives the “tyrant”, the “oligarchy” and the “democracy” as the three corruptions. The work is the principal scholastic treatise on rule. It sits under “Rule for the ruler’s good” as the definition.

In chapter XVIII of the Second Treatise, “Of Tyranny”, Locke defines the word. He says “tyranny is the exercise of power beyond right”, and speaks of using power “not for the good of those who are under it, but for his own private separate advantage”. It sits under “Rule for the ruler’s good” as that definition.