The Great Commentary of Cornelius a Lapide: the Second Epistle to the Corinthians
Chapter 12
i. That the Corinthians may esteem him above the false apostles, he describes his being carried up into the third heaven.
ii. He goes on to say (ver. 7) that to prevent his being puffed up a thorn in the flesh was given him ; for strength is made perfect in weakness.
iii. He clears himself (ver. 11) from any charge of self-love, by pointing out that it was they who had compelled him to praise himself, instead of commending him, as they ought to have done, for his long-suffering, miracles, preaching without charge, charity, and care for them.
iv. He refutes the calumny (ver. 17) brought against him, that he collected money from them craftily, not personally, but by means of Titus.
v. He expresses a fear (ver. 21) lest, when he should come to them, he might find some of them involved in dissensions and other sins ; and thus he tacitly warns them that he may with grief be compelled to castigate them.
Ver. 2 . — I knew a man in Christ. A Christian. He thus describes him, says Theophylact, that it may be clear that Paul was taken up by the grace of Christ, and not, like Simon Magus, by the power of the devil.
Above fourteen years ago. Hence we conclude that this rapture of S. Paul took place about nine years after his conversion, which took place a.d. 36 ; Paul, therefore, was taken up a.d. 44, which was the ninth year from his conversion. It was in this year that, by the direction of the Holy Spirit, he was ordained, with Barnabas, Apostle and Doctor of the Gentiles (Acts xiii. 2), that is to say, a little before he began this apostleship. This is evident, because, as I said at the beginning of this Epistle, S. Paul wrote this a.d. 58, in the second year of Nero. This rapture of S. Paul did not take place, therefore, in the year of his conversion (Acts ix. 12), i.e., a.d. 36, though some join S. Thomas in assigning it to that year.
Theophylact remarks on the modesty of the Apostle in having kept this silent for fourteen years. Secondly, he points out that Paul, fourteen years before, was privileged to contemplate such deep things, how much more did he merit it now, after the labours of so many years ?
Whether in the body I cannot tell . Although the Apostle says that he knows nothing for certain about this rapture, yet S. Thomas (ii. ii. qu. 175, art. 5), and others think it probable that his soul remained united to his body as its form, otherwise Paul would have died and then risen again. Moreover, it does not beseem God, when He throws men into an ecstasy, to kill them ; nay, such a process would not be one of rapture and ecstasy, but a putting to death. This, too, would involve the multiplication of many miracles. But it is a principle that we should not multiply miracles; therefore it is easier and more natural to suppose that, like other Saints, Paul was carried up while remaining in the body.
Caught up . “ To be caught up is,” says S. Thomas, “ to be raised from what is natural to what is supernatural by the power of the higher nature .” Hence angels and the Blessed are not caught up when they see God. Although they are raised above nature, yet they are not cut off from nature, i.e. , from the power man has of naturally having consciousness of objects by means of his bodily senses and his re-presentative powers. But when “ caught up,” the soul is deprived of the use of its senses and imagination, and Paul, therefore, was so deprived, or he would have known that he was in the body. Moreover, such abstraction, as S. Thomas says, may take place under the influence of disease, as when a man is delirious, or even by the power of devils, as when they carry off a man. It is not, however, called rapture or ecstasy, unless wrought by a power, which withdraws the mind from the senses, and lifts it up to the contemplation of things supernatural.
To the third heaven . What is this heaven? 1. S. Basil (Hom. i. in Hexaem.) infers from this that there is not merely one heaven, as Chrysostom thought, nor two, as Theophylact held, but at least three. Some add that there are three only, and that the third is the highest. But all the astronomers of olden times will dispute this, for they reckoned eight at least, as will moderns, who count at least eleven.
2. S. Thomas says (ii. ii. qu. 175, art 3, ad. 4): “By the third heaven may be understood any supernatural vision , and in three ways it may be called the third heaven . First, with relation to man's cognitive powers. Then the first heaven will be any supernatural , corporal vision , seen by the bodily eye , such as that of the handwriting on the wall, described in Daniel v. The second heaven will be any vision presented to the imagination, such as that of Isaiah , and of S. John in the Apocalypse. The third heaven will be any intellectual vision, such as is explained by S. Augustine (super Gen . ad Litt. 12).
“ Secondly , the distinction may be made according to the different orders of the objects of consciousness . Then the first heaven will be the knowledge of celestial bodies ; the second, the knowledge of celestial spirits ; the third, the knowledge of God Himself.
“ Thirdly , the three heavens may be the different steps of the knowledge God is seen. The first will then belong to the angels of the lowest hierarchy ; the second to the angels of the middle hierarchy ; the third to the angels of the highest.” According to this test, S. Paul would have been caught up to the third and highest hierarchy of angels, and standing there with the seraphim, have seen most clearly the essence of God, and from thence have been enkindled with that burning fire of charity with which he afterwards set on fire the whole world.
But I should say that the third heaven is the highest, or the empyrean, where the Blessed dwell. Hence, in ver. 4, it is called Paradise . It is called the third by a Hebraism. The number three denotes completion, being the first number to which the word all may be applied. We do not speak of " all two,” but we may and do say “all three.” Hence the poet says : “ Oh, thrice and four times blessed they,” &c, i.e., completely blessed. Again (in Amos i. 3) we read, “ for three transgressions of Damascus, ” meaning, for all. In ver. 8 of this chapter again, we have, “ I besought the Lord thrice,” or, very often, till I could ask no more, until the answer came : “ My grace is sufficient for thee.”
3. It is simplest of all to say with S. Thomas, in the passage above quoted, that “the first heaven is the sidereal, the second the crystalline , the third the empyrean,” or, rather, that “the first is the aerial, the second the sidereal, the third the empyrean ,” as Theophylact gives them. With him agree Julian Pomerius, and Damascene (de Fide , lib. ii. c. 6), and many others. “ The air ” in Scripture is commonly called “ the heaven ; ” hence we get “ the birds of heaven.” The air, therefore, is the first heaven, and is called the aerial one. All the heavenly orbs are the second heaven, or the etherial, and the third is the empyrean. Hence Cajetan is wrong in rejecting the empyrean, in which the Blessed dwell, and supposing that the third is the crystalline. In this latter are the waters which, in Gen. i. and elsewhere, are said to be above the firmament.
Mystically, S. Bernard says that the three heavens are the Three Persons of the Holy Trinity, and also the three virtues and gifts by which we ascend to them and to the highest pinnacle of grace and glory, viz., humility, charity, and perfect union. He says (Tract, de Grad. Humil.) : “ Those whom , by His word and example, the Son has first taught humility , on whom the Holy Spirit has then poured the gift of charity , these the Father at length receives in glory. The Son makes them disciples , the Paraclete comforts them as friends, the Father exalts them as sons. Firstly , He instructs them as a Master ; secondly , He comforts them as a Friend or a Brother ; thirdly , He embraces them as sons. From the first union of the Word and reason is born humility ; from the second union of the Spirit of God with the will of man comes charity ; then at last the Father unites to Himself His glorious bride. And thus reason is not suffered to think of itself or of the will of its neighbour , but the beatified soul delights to say this alone : ‘The King hath brought me into His chamber.’ These steps were not surpassed by S. Paul, who declares that he was caught up to the third heaven .”